U.S. Intellectual History Blog

The Myth of Black Confederates and Fake Racial Tolerance

This picture of the (Union) Louisiana Native Guard is frequently misrepresented as an image of Black Confederate troops.

One of the latest Confederate monument fights is currently brewing in South Carolina.  State Representatives Bill Chumley and Mike Burns have proposed erecting a monument to Black Confederate soldiers.  The problem, of course, is that there were no Black Confederate soldiers. The Confederate government refused to allow Blacks to enlist until March 1865, when, desperate for manpower, the Confederate Congress passed a law allowing African Americans to serve in combat roles. Even with the war nearly lost, this move was extremely controversial, as it flew in the face of Confederate racial ideology. “In my opinion, the worst calamity that could befall us would be to gain our independence by the valor of our slaves, instead of own,” wrote Robert Toombs, the first Confederate Secretary of State and a General in the Confederate army, “The day that the army of Virginia allows a negro regiment to enter their lines as soldiers they will be degraded, ruined, and disgraced.” Two weeks after the law allowing their service was passed and before any Black troops could be enlisted, the war was over.

But in recent years, the myth of the Black Confederates has grown. Early Lost Cause ideology was often frankly racist. Works like D.W. Griffith’s Birth of a Nation (1915), and the Thomas Dixon novels on which it was based, depicted the Confederacy as explicitly a white man’s cause.  While neo-Confederate accounts of the Civil War and Reconstruction often displaced slavery as the cause of the conflict and depicted the South as fighting for “states’ rights” or even a lower tariff, there was at first no attempt to reimagine the Confederacy as a land of racial equality, especially since the vision of the Lost Cause was actively used as a defense of Jim Crow.

But after the rise of the modern Civil Rights movement, it became convenient to claim that the Confederate fight was an interracial one. On the basis of no evidence whatsoever, the myth grew.  “The modern myth of black Confederate soldiers,” notes the Civil War Trust on their webpage devoted to this tale,

is akin to a conspiracy theory—shoddy analysis has been presented, repeated, amplified, and twisted to such an extent that utterly baseless claims of as many as 80,000 black soldiers fighting for the Confederacy (which would roughly equal the size of Lee’s army at Gettysburg) have even made their way into classroom textbooks.  It is right to study, discover, and share facts about the complex lives of 19th century black Americans.  It is wrong to exaggerate, obfuscate, and ignore those facts in order to suit 21st century opinions.

(The Civil War Trust also notes that this story could only grow once all the veterans of that conflict, who clearly never saw tens of thousands of Black Confederates in uniform, were no longer around to deny the story.)

But in many ways the most fascinating, and to my mind disturbing, part of the ridiculous attempt in South Carolina to erect a monument to imaginary Black Confederates has been the reaction of younger white nationalists to the suggestion.  There has apparently been a pushback from the far right against the notion of a “Rainbow Confederacy.” The sorts of people who marched in Charlottesville last year openly embrace white supremacy and, not surprisingly, openly celebrate the Confederacy’s white supremacy, too.

Though historians should all want to see the myth of the Black Confederates disappear, its ideological usefulness in recent decades actually reflects positive changes in American life. While white supremacy has remained a powerful force in our political life, open white supremacy grew less socially and politically acceptable.  Just as hypocrisy is the tribute that vice plays to virtue, the myth of Black Confederates was an attempted accommodation to the new political realities of post-Civil Rights and Voting Rights Act America. It is the kind of myth that appeals to white supremacists who like to be able to tell themselves that they are not racist.

But especially over the last two years, the open expression of racism has come to play a larger and larger role in our political life. We now have a president who suggests that some neo-Nazis are good people and who rails against accepting immigrants from “shithole” countries in Africa.

No wonder that the far right is losing its felt need to simulate racial tolerance. When people who want to erect a monument to imaginary Black Confederates are not the worst players in a story about public commemoration, we are in a very bad place.

2 Thoughts on this Post

S-USIH Comment Policy

We ask that those who participate in the discussions generated in the Comments section do so with the same decorum as they would in any other academic setting or context. Since the USIH bloggers write under our real names, we would prefer that our commenters also identify themselves by their real name. As our primary goal is to stimulate and engage in fruitful and productive discussion, ad hominem attacks (personal or professional), unnecessary insults, and/or mean-spiritedness have no place in the USIH Blog’s Comments section. Therefore, we reserve the right to remove any comments that contain any of the above and/or are not intended to further the discussion of the topic of the post. We welcome suggestions for corrections to any of our posts. As the official blog of the Society of US Intellectual History, we hope to foster a diverse community of scholars and readers who engage with one another in discussions of US intellectual history, broadly understood.

    • I’d recommend reading the more recent engagements with that very problematic piece at The Root. This, for example, from Jan. 2018: South Carolina Republicans Want to Build Stupidest Confederate Monument Ever.

      Indeed, Kevin Levin, a historian who is an expert on the myth of the Black Confederate soldier, with a forthcoming book on the (fruitless!) search for “Black Confederates,” pointed to The Root’s past flirtations with this myth as problematic and needing clarification in this essay, also published in 2018: What is The Root’s Position on Black Confederates?.

      So what Thomas S. is pointing to as “recommended reading” is in fact part of the mythos, not an analysis of it. (See the links in Levin’s blog post for the debunking of the 2015 piece.)

      Gotta keep up with the literature, man.

Comments are closed.