“Subtle links join subjective to objective elements in the practice of the historian’s craft. While the world of the elapsed past has its own reality, independent of who attempts to view and describe it, the scholar’s vision is subjective, at least to the extent that his own point of observation and the complex lenses of prejudice, interest, and preconception shape what he discerns and therefore what he can portray.”
Oscar Handlin, Truth in History (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1979), 1.
One Thought on this Post
S-USIH Comment Policy
We ask that those who participate in the discussions generated in the Comments section do so with the same decorum as they would in any other academic setting or context. Since the USIH bloggers write under our real names, we would prefer that our commenters also identify themselves by their real name. As our primary goal is to stimulate and engage in fruitful and productive discussion, ad hominem attacks (personal or professional), unnecessary insults, and/or mean-spiritedness have no place in the USIH Blog’s Comments section. Therefore, we reserve the right to remove any comments that contain any of the above and/or are not intended to further the discussion of the topic of the post. We welcome suggestions for corrections to any of our posts. As the official blog of the Society of US Intellectual History, we hope to foster a diverse community of scholars and readers who engage with one another in discussions of US intellectual history, broadly understood.
“While the world of the elapsed past has its own reality, independent of who attempts to view and describe it . . .”
Somewhere a presentist’s ears are burning, and somewhere else, a postmodernist’s.