U.S. Intellectual History Blog

One Thought on this Post

S-USIH Comment Policy

We ask that those who participate in the discussions generated in the Comments section do so with the same decorum as they would in any other academic setting or context. Since the USIH bloggers write under our real names, we would prefer that our commenters also identify themselves by their real name. As our primary goal is to stimulate and engage in fruitful and productive discussion, ad hominem attacks (personal or professional), unnecessary insults, and/or mean-spiritedness have no place in the USIH Blog’s Comments section. Therefore, we reserve the right to remove any comments that contain any of the above and/or are not intended to further the discussion of the topic of the post. We welcome suggestions for corrections to any of our posts. As the official blog of the Society of US Intellectual History, we hope to foster a diverse community of scholars and readers who engage with one another in discussions of US intellectual history, broadly understood.

  1. David,

    Anyone who has read both a solid first-year college survey text (i.e. Faragher et al’s Out of Many) and, per the article, Perlstein’s book on Goldwater will understand the first 3/4 the piece perfectly. That portion is Patricia Limerick 101—but in a good way. To me, the last 1/4 on Palin and Alaska is the most informative.

    Still, it’s good to tie history to the present. Were I teaching a pre or post-CW survey this term, this article would be required reading.

    – TL

Comments are closed.