Historian Karl Jacoby’s 2009 Shadows at Dawn: An Apache Massacre and the Violence of History presents the perspectives of the four groups involved leading up to the Camp Grant massacre of 1871, as well as each group’s ever-changing memories in the aftermath of violence. Perpetrated by the Americans, Mexicans, and O’odham, the Camp Grant massacre murdered and scalped over a hundred Apache women and children. Last month, I brought Shadows at Dawn on vacation to Walt Disney World’s Magic Kingdom because I was responsible for a TA-led discussion on it later that week. While packing, I thought that the heartwarming Magic Kingdom and heart-wrenching Shadows at Dawn were a paradoxical combination. This assumption was wrong. In reality, Walt Disney’s Magic Kingdom and Karl Jacoby’s Shadows at Dawn demonstrate opposite approaches to the same history of American conquest.
A central takeaway from Shadows at Dawn is that despite different quantities of remaining sources from the perpetrators and the victims, a chapter using official American government sources is about as reliable as a chapter that Jacoby strung together using circumstantial evidence from the Apache. Similarly, a chapter compiling information from Mexican newspapers is only as true as the chapter interpreting O’odham “calendar sticks,” which signified the O’odham’s method of recording the history that mattered to them.
Jacoby’s argument is not as simple as the winners write history. Or as Winston Churchill quipped, “history will be kind to me for I intend to write it.” To the contrary, Shadows at Dawn concludes that the historian’s critical interpretation, the official records from the times, and might I add Disney’s romanticizing what happened, all signify representations of memory. Like any good historian, Jacoby devotes extra care and sympathy toward the perspectives of the victims, the Apache. But this does not detract from the point that each group – Americans, Mexicans, O’odham, Apache, and I am adding Magic Kingdom – offers a different perspective on the same human affairs.
Thunder Mountain is one of Magic Kingdom’s two roller coasters. As the self-proclaimed “wildest ride in the west,” the Thunder Mountain roller coaster’s cars form a train. Railroads did indeed transform the American west, and the sights, sounds, and feel of this ride simulate Disney World’s interpretation of that nineteenth-century transformation. The other roller coaster in Magic Kingdom is the Seven Dwarfs Mine Train roller coaster. Based on the 1937 Snow White and the Seven Dwarfsfilm, animatronic Doc, Grumpy, Happy, Sneezy, Sleepy, Bashful, and Dopey are working in the mines during the ride, singing “heigh ho.” Like railroads, the mines and the people who labored in them, sometimes to make others rich, did indeed transform the American west. Workers might have even sung.
Mines and railroads each play a central role in the latter half of Jacoby’s Shadows at Dawn, which traces the aftermath of trauma. Readers learn that the American government confined both O’odham perpetrators and the remaining Apache to reservations, to make way for American conquest and expansion. American participants renounced their former Mexican allies due to race, to cement their own power. All perpetrators of the murder and scalping of over a hundred women and children soon found their economic status dependent on how well they adapted to the railroads and mining industry. Jacoby writes: “Almost overnight, the railroad ruptured the long-standing circuits of exchange in the region, shifting the dominant flow of trade from its north-south axis between Arizona and Sonora to an east-west orientation that linked Tucson to California and the Atlantic seaboard.” Visitors from across the country and world to Magic Kingdom experience Thunder Mountain from the perspective of riding in the train, not outside watching the innovation raze their environment. Vacationers likewise watch fictional Seven Dwarfs labor in the mines, resembling how Americans passed unpleasant labor to people they perceived as inferior.
Disney theme parks’ role in remembering history is nothing new. In 1995, Richard Francaviglia published “History after Disney: The Significance of ‘Imagineered’ Historical Places” in The Public Historian, arguing: “Disney’s portrayal of the past does indeed remain an issue for both public and academic historians. [The author] urges that we look more closely and dispassionately at the Disney Parks’ role in historical interpretation, for it can tell as much about popular perceptions of history and historic places.” Although Francaviglia mentions neither Native Americans nor violence, he proves that Disney is a window into American collective memory of history. He claims that Disney “replicated essences of historic environments through a complex process of selection and abstraction of landscape features or elements,” which applies to both roller coaster landscapes. “Frontierland,” notably Thunder Mountain, signifies “explicit testimony to the power of the frontier experience in shaping America’s image of itself. Like most Americans, Disney looked west for adventure.” Although Jacoby would not call it “adventure,” Shadows at Dawninterprets the same westward expansion and conquest.
Maybe Magic Kingdom is a relaxing vacation destination precisely because it diverges from my daily life’s purpose of analyzing history critically. But while the “happiest place on earth” might be less critical, that should not isolate it from real American history and the complex processes of memory. I am by no means claiming that the fun rides should somehow incorporate these nuances. Instead, I am suggesting that Shadows at Dawn is the perfect book to bring on your next Disney trip to insert more balance into American collective memory.
4 Thoughts on this Post
S-USIH Comment Policy
We ask that those who participate in the discussions generated in the Comments section do so with the same decorum as they would in any other academic setting or context. Since the USIH bloggers write under our real names, we would prefer that our commenters also identify themselves by their real name. As our primary goal is to stimulate and engage in fruitful and productive discussion, ad hominem attacks (personal or professional), unnecessary insults, and/or mean-spiritedness have no place in the USIH Blog’s Comments section. Therefore, we reserve the right to remove any comments that contain any of the above and/or are not intended to further the discussion of the topic of the post. We welcome suggestions for corrections to any of our posts. As the official blog of the Society of US Intellectual History, we hope to foster a diverse community of scholars and readers who engage with one another in discussions of US intellectual history, broadly understood.
Rebecca, thanks so much for this post, which was . I’ve never been to Disneyworld, but first went to Disneyland in 1970 — I am old AF — and have been back a bajillion times since. So I remember (among other things) lettered tickets for rides (yes, I have gone on some E ticket rides), Mission to Mars, the People Mover, America Sings, and various and sundry other vanished attractions.
America Sings was an enclosed circular building with theater seating in self-contained sections forming an outer ring of the building, and a central animatronic stage setup forming the inner ring. The outer ring of theater seating rotated around the inner, fixed stage, stopping for one segment of the American past portrayed in folk songs performed by animatronic critters, and then rotating around to the next set-up while a new audience group got loaded into the theater. (After the ride closed, the critters got re-used in Splash Mountain.) It was always astonishing to see the outside walls of the building and see the whole giant mechanism turning.
I’m trying to think of what other attractions besides this one presented an explicit narrative account of the American past. I guess maybe the Hall of Presidents? But it seems to be the case that the Disneyfication of history, at least at the theme park, is less about history as narrative and more about history envisioned as set design — the visual details that gesture toward period and place and people that Francaviglia mentions and that you emphasize in this post.
One issue that I find interesting in this connection is the culture wars battles that happen when Disney decides to change a ride or even get rid of an attraction. “Injun Joe’s Cave” on Tom Sawyer’s Island, the woman-chasing and wife-selling in Pirates of the Caribbean — these “historic details” of completely fictional and contrived worlds become a fixed past, an established truth that must be defended against reinterpretation or revision. What makes Disneyland “the happiest place on earth” for people may not be the sense of escape to history, to “a simpler time,” or a sanitized time, but rather an escape from history, an escape from the flow of time that forces reassessments and reinterpretations. When history, a new reckoning with an old past, intrudes on the Magic Kingdom, people cry foul.
interesting point about nostalgia! for me, Disney World is escape from work, which happens to be history. for some, it’s simply nostalgia. And for others as you mention, it’s an escape from dynamic history into an imagined static past!
I just wanted to quickly chime in and say I really enjoyed this meditation on the relationship between history and different forms of popular memory of the past.
thanks for chiming in and for reading!