Editor's Note
Que Dios no te dé paz y sí gloria.
-Miguel de Unamuno y Jugo
I just learned the sad news that Jesse Lemisch has passed away.
Many of our readers have known Jesse as a friend and/or a sparring partner for decades, and many more have known his name and work. If anyone wishes to write a remembrance of Jesse, we would be very glad to publish it here at the blog.
I met Jesse late in his life, but at a crucial juncture in mine. I attended the 2012 AHA meeting in Chicago, and sat in on the plenary session about the academic job market and “Plan B” for historians. Jesse was on that panel, and he was having none of “Plan B.” Instead, he called for a new WPA for historians. He wanted the AHA to lobby for and fight for funding for under-employed and professionally-trained historians to undertake various projects that would serve the public good by capturing what they could – what we could – of the ever-receding past. He was combative, ornery, bordering on the contemptuous towards his interlocutors for what he believed was a lack of vision and a lack of will or a lack of courage. That was Jesse.
Later that evening, I attended the Oxford University Press happy hour at the invitation of Heather Cox Richardson, who had been virtual mentor for a while but whom I finally had the chance to meet in person. And there, gripping his walker and by turns scowling and beaming, was Jesse, with his good friend Joanne Landy, slowly making his way toward the door to call it a night. I walked up to him, put my hand on his shoulder and said, “You know, for an old dude, you really can kick some ass.” He threw back his head and laughed until the tears rolled down his cheeks.
So we became instant friends, and friends we remained, through many an online donnybrook. Once in a while we would talk on the phone, or exchange emails or Facebook messages. In the weeks and months following his wife Naomi Weisstein’s death we spoke more frequently than we had before. He cried, and I cried with him. But then he would harrumph and clear his throat and get back to the business of dispensing advice to me and / or anathemas on other historians of our acquaintance. He knew I was a vital center liberal, not a Leftist, and that I was (and am) suspicious of “revolution” as a mindset and a mode of existence. However, he also knew that I was coming into my own as an intellectual who is also a woman, and he identified my personal journey with Naomi’s much more powerful and public fight. Indeed, in many ways her struggle made my career possible, and we talked about that.
He would say the most irate things to me on Facebook or in blog comments – to me, to my friends, to people he had never met and who, after tangling with him, perhaps wouldn’t look forward to meeting him. Though I wouldn’t have put up with such combativeness from anybody else – not from anybody – I always gave him a pass. (Though I messaged him once or twice on the backchannel and asked him to lighten up, for heaven’s sake.)
I called him by turns ornery, irascible, crusty, and crotchety – and instead of taking those as a compliment, he told me those were ageist terms that I wouldn’t apply to someone as young as I am. (I am 49, but it’s always nice to seem young to somebody.) And he was right. Those are terms we reserve for disputants of a certain age, to diminish the threat their ideas or their approach may pose to the social order.
So Jesse was as forbearing to me as I was to him, never throwing a haymaker or trying to land a knockout blow in an online argument, but retreating to his corner and letting me retreat to mine – and then postgaming the argument with me afterward. He was a sparring partner and a kind of pal in the profession when I really needed one.
Jesse Lemisch was a great historian. He was one of those rare historians who themselves make history. He always wanted to stand on the side of justice, he always wanted to stand with the powerless against the powerful, and he did his best to find that ground and hold that ground — even if that meant the occasional jab at those standing nearest to him.
Jesse Lemisch was something else. And he was – amazingly, improbably – my friend.
Jesse, God grant thee not peace but glory.
8 Thoughts on this Post
S-USIH Comment Policy
We ask that those who participate in the discussions generated in the Comments section do so with the same decorum as they would in any other academic setting or context. Since the USIH bloggers write under our real names, we would prefer that our commenters also identify themselves by their real name. As our primary goal is to stimulate and engage in fruitful and productive discussion, ad hominem attacks (personal or professional), unnecessary insults, and/or mean-spiritedness have no place in the USIH Blog’s Comments section. Therefore, we reserve the right to remove any comments that contain any of the above and/or are not intended to further the discussion of the topic of the post. We welcome suggestions for corrections to any of our posts. As the official blog of the Society of US Intellectual History, we hope to foster a diverse community of scholars and readers who engage with one another in discussions of US intellectual history, broadly understood.
Thank you so much for your lovely words about Jesse. He was best friends with my father. After his death in 1980 he became a father figure to me. He was so weird and outrageous. I adored him.
I would love to exchange stories with you. We are the same age.
What a beautiful eulogy of an obviously complicated man. I am so sorry for your loss.
Marcus Rediker’s preface to Jack Tar v. John Bull is an excellent summation of Jesse Lemisch’s approach to history and historians and life itself.
Jesse Lemisch
We’ve been much lessened by his loss.
Very simply, Jesse has inspired me as a person and as a scholar and as somebody who just plain cared. I did not know him personally for very long and that was very long. But like Staughton, like Al Young, like Marcus Rediker now (Al said that of him), like Vine de Loria and Howard Zinn and Roxanne Dunbar Ortiz (whom I met at Jesse’s apartment), like Vincent Harding and Gerda Lerner (I met her at Jesse’s too–it was a great year in New York, too long ago) Jesse had the pure fire.
I so appreciate this wonderful tribute to a wonderful teacher. Having taken his Social History class at the University of Buffalo in the early 1980s, Prof Lemisch launched my lifelong interest in history from the bottom up. Prof Burnett’s description of him certainly rings true, especially when Prof Lemisch was among his colleagues at conferences, but with graduate students he proved to be ever respectful. Time spent in his classes always provided an opportunity for hard thinking due to his thoughtful questions. It was a great privilege to have been one of his many students.
Professor Lubet’s memorial notice at The Faculty Lounge http://www.thefacultylounge.org/2018/09/jesse-lemisch-1936-2018-1.html
Re passings of historians: I discovered by accident yesterday that Robert Beisner, noted diplomatic historian and (among other things) biographer of Acheson, died last February. His politics/worldview were quite different than Jesse Lemisch’s, but that’s neither here nor there. I took a course in grad school with Beisner — on U.S. policy and strategy in WW 2 and the Cold War — shortly before he retired from teaching. A good course. (I was in an IR program not history, but that didn’t matter.)