U.S. Intellectual History Blog

Reconstruction Reading List

Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s recent comments on the Reconstruction era have, to say the least, raised the eyebrows of historians who study the time period. Where she argues that the era could have used “a little less rancor,” historians of the period see an American South filled both with a radical democratic promise and a region gripped by reactionary violence. Rancor and political incivility, while part of the history of Reconstruction in the South, were not the center of that story. Clinton’s comments are seen as an extension of the old “Dunning School” of thought on Reconstruction. Named after Columbia historian William Dunning, the “Dunning School” has become synonymous with a viewpoint of the Reconstruction period as a disaster for the South and the nation due to “black rule” in the region by recently freed Black Americans, seemingly unfit for politics and democracy.

What I will do here is assemble a short reading list about Reconstruction. While it is  sad that history seems to pop up in the public eye largely during moments of tragedy or political gaffes, historians will never have a better opportunity to talk to the public about what we do—and how we do it. This list, of course, should begin with the Dunning School itself, and the work that best propagated its argument. Claude Bowers The Tragic Era (1929) summarized many of the key arguments made by Dunning and his students. E. Merton Coulter’s The South During Reconstruction (1947) was also a major book in the Dunning tradition.

W.E.B. Du Bois’ Black Reconstruction in America: 1860-1880 (1935) was a significant challenge to the Dunning School tradition. Meticulously researched, and offering a Marxist interpretation of the Civil War and Reconstruction eras in the South, it would be decades before Du Bois’ work was known beyond a small number of scholars. Kenneth Stampp would, of course, go a long way in changing the understanding of Reconstruction in the 1950s and 1960s. His The Era of Reconstruction (1965) and his edited collection, with Leon Litwack, titled Reconstruction: An Anthology of Revisionist Writings (1969) reflected a changing consensus on the Reconstruction period. Born out of the then-contemporary experience of the Civil Rights Movement, coupled with the rise of both social history and Black Studies, Reconstruction’s historiography was dramatically re-shaped in the latter half of the twentieth century. (It’s important to note that the anthology Reconstruction includes sections from Black Reconstruction by Du Bois, as well as writings by Joel Williamson, Horace Mann Bond, James M. McPherson, and others.)

To add to the scholarship from the 1950s and 1960s, C. Vann Woodward’s essay “The Political Legacy of the First Reconstruction,” initially published in The Journal of Negro Education (vol. XXVI, p. 231-240, 1957) and later republished in his The Burden of reconstruction picSouthern History, is an important short read that shows how one of the most prominent Southern historians in the nation approached Reconstruction with his own unique brand of nuance and tragic irony. In addition, by the late 1960s, Lerone Bennett of Ebony magazine used that publication as a public forum for talking about Reconstruction. As more and more Americans became interested in the events of a century before, Bennett and others took the scholarship of Du Bois, Stampp, and others and used it as the basis for a new, public accounting of the Reconstruction era. The issues of Ebony magazine in the late 1960s are filled with references to Reconstruction—a topic of interest on the blog over a year ago.

Eric Foner’s work, Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution (1988) has been the standard by which Reconstruction histories have since been measured. Coupled with books such as Steven Hahn’s A Nation Under Our Feet (2003), narratives about Reconstruction are become more and more complicated. Add to that a new focus on a “Greater Reconstruction” that moves the narrative beyond the South and looks at the age from a national perspective—think about works by Heather C. Richardson (The Death of Reconstruction: Race, Labor, and Politics in the Post-Civil War North published in 2001 and West from Appomattox: The Reconstruction of America after the Civil War, released in 2007) as a good example of how the field of Reconstruction is becoming diversified by questions that seek to tie together issues that, for Americans living in the late nineteenth century, were not always seen separately: labor, race, gender, the future of the South and the West.

Gregory P. Downs’ After Appomattox conceptualizes the Reconstruction era as a story of failed military occupation. Just as the revisionist histories of Reconstruction in the 1960s were heavily influenced by the Civil Rights Movement, Downs’ book is one born out of concern with America’s occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan in the first two decades of the twenty-first century. With the continued focus on the international dimensions of American political and intellectual history—think of Natalie Ring’s The Problem South as an example of this scholarship—it is only a matter of time before historians begin putting the issues of Reconstruction in conversation with events in the Caribbean, South America, and Europe. Reconstructions: New Perspectives on Postbellum United States (2008) offers a series of essays that show where some of these new directions could go—including in intellectual history, a field that still has much to say about the Reconstruction era but has been well-served by Leslie Butler’s Critical Americans: Victorian Intellectuals and Transatlantic Liberal Reform (2007).

The editors of Civil War History recently published a forum on the Reconstruction era.[1] Featuring Eric Foner, Charles Calhoun, Jane Turner Censer, and Andrew Slap, the forum posed a simple question: where do we go next in Reconstruction studies? As the sesquicentennial of the Civil War fades into memory, and we now “celebrate” 150 years since the start of America’s most radical experiment with democratic rule in its history, thinking about the Reconstruction era becomes all the more important. Hillary Clinton’s gaffe will quickly fade from memory. Let us hope that interest in Reconstruction, spurred by her curious statement, will lead to more reading and thinking about the troubled era.

[1] “Historians’ Forum: Reconstruction,” Civil War History, Vol. 61, No. 3, Sept. 2015, pp. 281-301.

11 Thoughts on this Post

S-USIH Comment Policy

We ask that those who participate in the discussions generated in the Comments section do so with the same decorum as they would in any other academic setting or context. Since the USIH bloggers write under our real names, we would prefer that our commenters also identify themselves by their real name. As our primary goal is to stimulate and engage in fruitful and productive discussion, ad hominem attacks (personal or professional), unnecessary insults, and/or mean-spiritedness have no place in the USIH Blog’s Comments section. Therefore, we reserve the right to remove any comments that contain any of the above and/or are not intended to further the discussion of the topic of the post. We welcome suggestions for corrections to any of our posts. As the official blog of the Society of US Intellectual History, we hope to foster a diverse community of scholars and readers who engage with one another in discussions of US intellectual history, broadly understood.

  1. Robert, thanks for this post and this fine reading list.

    Though it’s not focused on Reconstruction per se, David Blight’s Race and Reunion would be a nice complement to this list. That’s a book that everybody and anybody would do well to read in order to understand why and how certain misconceptions and misrepresentations about the Civil War/Reconstruction have had such staying power.

    It’s a little meta to put it this way, but I think it’s a great book for conveying the basic idea that what so many people mistakenly believe to be “the history” itself has a history. Blight tells the story of several decades of coordinated efforts to obfuscate/reframe Civil War/Reconstruction history and goes a long way toward explaining why those of us who teach U.S. history are still having to address this mistaken and profoundly unhelpful conception of the past among our own students.

    (Plus David Blight’s book changed my life. So, any chance I get to recommend it, I’m there!)

    • (I realize you are perfectly familiar w/ Blight’s book, as are our regular readers. My comment above is for the benefit of others who will find this post via links and recommendations.)

      • Like I said on Facebook, thanks so much for mentioning this book. It is one of the finest works of history I’ve ever read, and like you, shaped my career as a historian. Blight’s follow up, “American Oracle,” about Civil War memory in the mid-20th century is worth a read too.

  2. Thanks for these great recommendations – I just ordered several of these (including Race and Reunion – thanks LD Burnett) and look forward to reading them.

  3. Thanks for the excellent reading list, Robert & all. To add:
    1. Nina Silber, The Romance of Reunion: must-read on the manufacture of regional identity and culture, 1865-1900.
    2. Edward J. Blum and W. Scott Poole, eds., Vale of Tears: New Essays on Religion and Reconstruction. Covers aspects of faith, violence, segregation, along with how religious rhetoric informed Reconstruction-era politics.
    3. Thomas J. Brown, “Reconstruction and the House Museum”: http://werehistory.org/house-museum/
    4. Gregory P. Downs and Kate Masur, “There’s No National Site Devoted to Reconstruction–Yet,” The Atlantic: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/04/theres-no-national-site-devoted-to-reconstructionyet/389138/
    5. Laura F. Edwards, Scarlett Doesn’t Live Here Anymore: Southern Women in the Civil War Era.

    • Thanks for including some public history work in your listings, Sara–one of my friends here, Jennifer Taylor, does some wonderful work in public history and Reconstruction as well.

  4. For those who are interested, I recommend two books. James K. Hogue, An Uncivil War: Five New Orleans Street Battles and the Rise and Fall of Radical Reconstruction. James G. Hollandsworth, Jr. An Absolute Massacre: The New Orleans Race Riot of July 30, 1866.

  5. Old but still great: Eric McKitrick, Andrew Johnson and Reconstruction (1960). Just a classic — some brilliant remarks about the nature of stump speaking during the era. And note that it appeared before Stampp: Stampp was far more comprehensive, but McKitrick broke the mould. I’m also a big fan of Barbara Jeanne Fields, Slavery and Freedom on the Middle Ground (1984), and Leon LItwack, Been In the Storm So Long (1979).

Comments are closed.