In lieu of a forum, which has seemed too clunky, please use this post to suggest and exchange panel ideas for the 2014 S-USIH conference in Indianapolis. I have embedded a link to this post on the 2014 conference page so that people can find it without searching through the blog. My hope is that the comments section can function well enough as a way to connect and put together panels. I also posted an announcement regarding this particular exchange in the member news section on the front page of the website.
Thanks and we look forward to seeing you in Indy this fall.
One Thought on this Post
S-USIH Comment Policy
We ask that those who participate in the discussions generated in the Comments section do so with the same decorum as they would in any other academic setting or context. Since the USIH bloggers write under our real names, we would prefer that our commenters also identify themselves by their real name. As our primary goal is to stimulate and engage in fruitful and productive discussion, ad hominem attacks (personal or professional), unnecessary insults, and/or mean-spiritedness have no place in the USIH Blog’s Comments section. Therefore, we reserve the right to remove any comments that contain any of the above and/or are not intended to further the discussion of the topic of the post. We welcome suggestions for corrections to any of our posts. As the official blog of the Society of US Intellectual History, we hope to foster a diverse community of scholars and readers who engage with one another in discussions of US intellectual history, broadly understood.
Panel Name: “The Enlightenment’s Second Life: Twentieth-Century American Legacies and Iterations.”
Ill fared the Enlightenment and its legacy during the twentieth century. Even in the United States where, as Henry May’s classic The Enlightenment in America noted, only a moderate variant of its temperament and philosophy took root, intellectuals critiqued forms of thought associated with the Enlightenment. Intellectual historians have diligently traced various permutations of this critical impulse including: the “antimodernists” of the late nineteenth century, New Humanists of the early twentieth, Frankfort School importation of critical theory in the mid-, and the postmodern assault on “metanarratives” and universals during the late-twentieth century. A less explored perspective on the Enlightenment and its American legacies, however, are its twentieth-century proponents.
This panel will investigate the various defenses of ideas and projects intellectuals have associated with Enlightenment thought. The aim is to discover the implications of these defenses for twentieth century American intellectual life. Papers should focus on both the intellectual as well as broader material contours and consequences of various modern heirs to the Enlightenment since many of the “policy disciplines” such as economics have been home to its most fervent defenders. In approaching the twentieth-century American iterations of the Enlightenment from this angle, this panel hopes to illuminate its lasting impact as well as begin to strike a balance with the current literature that focuses more on its critics than its proponents.
Those interested in participating in this panel should contact Brad Baranowski (University of Wisconsin-Madison) at [email protected]
Brad Baranowski
Doctoral Candidate
History Department
University of Wisconsin-Madison
[email protected]