U.S. Intellectual History Blog

2013 S-USIH Conference Plenaries

The 2013 S-USIH conference committee is pleased to announce the following plenary sessions. Plenaries will be held the evenings of November 1 and November 2, 2013:

1. Conservatism and Intellectual History: Pasts and Futures

George Nash’s seminal The Conservative Intellectual Movement in America established that the history of American conservatism was not only the history of political mobilization, social movement activism, or backlash politics, but of the articulation and circulation of conservative ideas. Mapping a multifaceted definition of conservatism–one that included anti-statism and libertarianism, social and intellectual traditionalism, and interventionist anti-communism–Nash’s work illustrated the complex and seemingly contradictory strands of post-war conservatism and charted the formation of conservative publications to cohere and circulate conservative ideas. The political and intellectual landscape has changed substantially since Nash’s first edition of this work was published in 1976, as has the scale, reach, and tone of conservative media outlets. In addition, a vast and rich historiography on American conservatism has emerged in the last 20 years, enriching our understanding of the rise of post-war right. This plenary will explore the intellectual history of conservatism in the US. It will consider how our understanding of conservative ideas, conservative intellectuals, and the conservative movement has shifted since the publication of Nash’s work.

Participants:

Angus Burgin (Johns Hopkins University)

Donald Critchlow (Arizona State University)

George Nash (Independent Scholar)

Kevin Schultz (University of Illinois at Chicago)

Leah Wright (Wesleyan University)

Moderator/chair: Lisa Szefel (Pacific University)

2. The United States and the World: Intellectual Histories of American Foreign Relations

U.S. foreign policy frequently has intersected with–and has been informed by–ideas about race and ethnicity, religious faith and spirituality, human rights, social science, and the moral and economic underpinnings of capitalism. Recent work in the field of U.S. international relations has called attention to the significance of ideology, has explored previously un-or-under-examined groups and concepts embedded in wider communities of exchange, and has emphasized the reciprocity inherent in America’s interactions with other nations. Building on such insights, this plenary brings together scholars who are all deeply engaged in a wide variety of intellectual historical approaches to the U.S.’s role in and with the world. The U.S. and the World plenary will discuss new directions in the field and varied efforts to trace the transnational flow of action, thought, and politics in U.S. and world history in and across national boundaries. Ultimately, the goal of this plenary is to examine the reciprocal relationship between intellectual history and the history of U.S. foreign relations with an emphasis on how the history of ideas has played a determinative role in U.S. foreign policy and how U.S. engagement with other nations has influenced the history of ideas in the U.S.

Participants:

Elizabeth Borgwardt (Washington University)

Mary Dudziak (Emory University)

David Engerman (Brandeis University)

Erez Manela (Harvard University)

Moderators/chairs: Christopher McKnight Nichols (Oregon State University) and Paul Rubinson (Bridgewater State University)

One Thought on this Post

S-USIH Comment Policy

We ask that those who participate in the discussions generated in the Comments section do so with the same decorum as they would in any other academic setting or context. Since the USIH bloggers write under our real names, we would prefer that our commenters also identify themselves by their real name. As our primary goal is to stimulate and engage in fruitful and productive discussion, ad hominem attacks (personal or professional), unnecessary insults, and/or mean-spiritedness have no place in the USIH Blog’s Comments section. Therefore, we reserve the right to remove any comments that contain any of the above and/or are not intended to further the discussion of the topic of the post. We welcome suggestions for corrections to any of our posts. As the official blog of the Society of US Intellectual History, we hope to foster a diverse community of scholars and readers who engage with one another in discussions of US intellectual history, broadly understood.

  1. Excellent! Huzzah! …I can’t come this year, so I’ll be looking forward to the live tweets and blogs, as well as the summaries after. – TL

Comments are closed.