On behalf of the other members of the Conference Committee–Committee Chair Mike O’Connor and Ray Haberski–I just wanted to publicly thank everyone who submitted papers or panels to this years conference. We had a dramatic increase in the number of submissions this year, which was both a blessing and a curse. Mike, Ray, and I strove, first and foremost, to create the best conference we could. This involved creating coherent panels, while making sure that a wide diversity of scholars working on as wide a range of topics as possible were represented. We’re very happy with the result, but we know that many excellent proposals couldn’t be fit into the program. Those accepted–and rejected–from the conference received private notice of their fate a couple weeks ago. But as we are finally able to publish the schedule today, I felt that it was worth adding this little note on the process.
U.S. Intellectual History Blog
Related Posts
Tim Lacy
January 11, 2008
Stayin’ Alive: Our CFP And Others Noted
In case you were wondering: Yes! This weblog is still alive. After an absence that’s lasted longer than intended, postings will resume today and onward. Just so you know that Read moreMichael J. Kramer
November 5, 2010
X-post: Michael Kramer Reflects On The Third Annual USIH Conference
Instituting Intellectual History: the ins and outs of academic intellectual historyNo ideas but in things. — William Carlos Williams At the closing panel of the third annual U.S. Intellectual History Read moreTim Lacy
December 13, 2012
0