Paul Krugman wrote a (very) long but worthy reflection on the history of the idea of macroeconomics. As you can see from my phrasing, I believe this piece rides the line between the history of ideas and the history of economics as an academic discipline. Your opinion of Krugman’s analyses of the present will likely dictate your acceptance of his narrative of events. He writes on the period beginning in the 1920s and ending with the Great Recession of 2008-09. The central characters in Krugman’s drama are Milton Friedman and John Maynard Keynes, as well as the intellectual descendants of each (today’s freshwater and saltwater economists, respectively). Again, the piece is rather lengthy but the pay-off makes your effort worthwhile. – TL
U.S. Intellectual History Blog
Related Posts
Ray Haberski
April 22, 2017
One Thought on this Post
S-USIH Comment Policy
We ask that those who participate in the discussions generated in the Comments section do so with the same decorum as they would in any other academic setting or context. Since the USIH bloggers write under our real names, we would prefer that our commenters also identify themselves by their real name. As our primary goal is to stimulate and engage in fruitful and productive discussion, ad hominem attacks (personal or professional), unnecessary insults, and/or mean-spiritedness have no place in the USIH Blog’s Comments section. Therefore, we reserve the right to remove any comments that contain any of the above and/or are not intended to further the discussion of the topic of the post. We welcome suggestions for corrections to any of our posts. As the official blog of the Society of US Intellectual History, we hope to foster a diverse community of scholars and readers who engage with one another in discussions of US intellectual history, broadly understood.
This comment has been removed by the author.